Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 5408 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
QA
YM YI YE

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ROME3205, ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT (ACTA): ITALY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ROME3205.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ROME3205 2006-12-01 09:09 2011-02-03 16:04 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Rome
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHRO #3205/01 3350932
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 010932Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6632
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 4442
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 0441
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 0537
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0843
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 1775
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO PRIORITY 0519
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 0385
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0483
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0163
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG PRIORITY 0122
UNCLAS ROME 003205  

SIPDIS  

SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS  

STATE PASS TO USTR STAN MCCOY AND RACHEL BAE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ETRD EINV KIPR PGOV IT
SUBJECT: ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT (ACTA):  ITALY 

INTERESTED  

REF: STATE 182554  

This cable is SBU please protect accordingly, not for Internet distribution.  

SUMMARY -------  

1.  (SBU) The GOI is interested in further discussing a possible ACTA, but underscores that Italy is committed to working within existing multilateral organizations and arrangements (i.e., the WTO and EU), and would have to evaluate very carefully adhering to any agreement outside these arrangements.  Italy is interested in attending a preliminary ACTA meeting in Washington. 

END SUMMARY.  

2.  (U) ECMIN raised ACTA with MFA Deputy Director for Economic Affairs Minister Spinetti November 17, and with Undersecretary Gianni at the Economic Development Ministry, November 21. ECMIN portrayed ACTA as a tool like-minded countries could use to advance the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) agenda dynamically and with fewer political difficulties than high-standards countries would encounter at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the European Union (EU), or even the G-8.  

3. (SBU) Both Spinetti and Gianni agreed with ECMIN in principle, expressed interest in the ACTA proposal, and indicated Italy agrees with ACTAQs proposed goals. Spinetti and Gianni also both indicated Italy should be part of the ACTA work-in-progress (at least as an Qinterested observerQ), and Spinetti suggested Italy might attend a launching session in Washington.  However, Spinetti and Gianni highlighted ItalyQs commitment to multilateral organizations, such as WIPO, the EU, and the G-8, and emphasized that the GOI must evaluate taking steps outside these institutions very carefully.  

4.  (SBU) Spinetti also told ECMIN that he had heard of a WIPO concern about ACTA Q that this agreement could potentially reduce WIPOQs leadership role in international IPR protection matters.  

5.  (SBU) ECONCOUNS then met with Fabrizio Pagani, Chief of Staff to Undersecretary to the Prime Minister, Enrico Letta, November 22.  Pagani has the working-level lead on G-8 IPR issues for Italy, and is the POC for GOI on ACTA. Pagani told ECONCOUNS that he had already discussed ACTA with Assistant Secretary Christopher Moore during the recent G-8 working-level IPR meeting in Moscow.  He underscored that the current GOI is very committed to working within existing multilateral organizations, and added that it would be Qeasier,Q if the Commission were also at any negotiating table. Pagani stated, nonetheless, that Italy is very interested in the proposal and could attend a preliminary session in Washington. That said, Pagani outlined a series of GOI concerns:  - EU Commission Role in the Negotiations.  Pagani does not believe the Commission has exclusive competence on IPR, but he does believe having the Commission at the table would make it QeasierQ for EU members in any eventual negotiation.  - A Role for Countries with Weak IPR Enforcement.  While he understood the rationale for not including countries with weak IPR regimens (e.g., China and Russia), Pagani indicated that Italy would want to discuss further the exclusion of such countries.  - Germany G-8 IPR Focus.  Pagani also expressed concern over possible political sensitivities in pursuing ACTA, while Germany simultaneously makes IPR protection a top priority of their G-8 Chairmanship.  

6. (SBU) However, when ECONCOUNS asked him directly if, all the above considered, Italy could actually participate in  ACTA negotiations, Pagani replied Italy would, if it were in Italys own interest to do so.  SPOGLI